#.BUNDLE FILES IN TRASH MAC#

The ramdisk has a different filename for each version and device, while the other three have the same name across versions (with n41 corresponding to iPhone5,1) The filenames depend on iOS version and device.lzssdec -o 384 (decompresses the decrypted file, skipping a 384 byte header).img3decrypt.rb 41 crypted (decrypts it).For kernel, there are a couple of ways, but you can use Img3decrypt (Ruby) and lzssdec (C++ source):.For all files except kernel: xpwntool -k -iv.Decrypt the files using Firmware Keys and xpwntool.

Change the extension from IPSW to ZIP, and grab the following files:.Alternatively, you can use partial-zip to grab the files below It is so well built (possibly because the team actually does prioritize the important stuff first) so I really want to SPM all the things. I wish that I wouldn't have to use unsupported hacks to use SPM. After all, there's many SPM early adopters here xcconfig file for SPM so it would add The praise for finding this problem on my end goes to the incredible here just in case anyone else runs into this. When recompiling the app with Swift 5 the problem goes away all by itself, but just in case I added an. Well to be honest: ' I was holding it wrong' So a previously working app suddenly crashed because I had the new version of Xcode installed. Turns out that SPM hardcodes the Xcode-included Swift libraries' path into the of its frameworks, so when my app launched (it was still compiled with Xcode 10.1 and Swift 4.2 was therefore embedded) it first tried to find the one from Xcode on my system and that didn't end well for the linker It couldn't find the Swift runtime… well, the correct one at least

#.BUNDLE FILES IN TRASH MAC#

Suddenly though this app did crash on launch on my Mac after I upgraded.

I had my frameworks integrated in to a macOS app by including the SPM project files. Yes please, especially since having been bit by a nasty little surprise when 10.14.4 and Xcode 10.2 was released. A first basic implementation could simply copy files found in a Resources directory of the target source folder to the respective TargetName.resources folder in the products directory.Īlso, if we want to support this type of architecture we will have to start to rely in dynamic linking instead of static linking executable products (otherwise we would have to copy all the input resources to the executable resources directory, with potential collisions).įinally, this approach would be designed for non-Darwin platforms (Darwin would have to use frameworks for libraries and app bundles? for executables as freestanding bundles are not welcome). This opens the way to the introduction of the Resources story of Swift PM. Let barBundle = Bundle(for: BarLibrar圜lf)īarBundle.path(forResource: 'BarImage', withExtension: 'png') FooExecutable.resources/FooResource.json We can access the resources with the Bundle API: (forResource: 'FooResource', withExtension: 'json') This means that with the following structure: FooExecutable Once Swift Foundation PR #1573 and #1570 are merged we will be able to use Bundle API on Linux with Freestanding bundles.

.bundle files in trash